One of the most influential authors in this line of new experimentalism has been
Ian Hacking, with his critique to positivistic philosophies of science for their
‘‘single-minded obsession with representation and thinking and theory, at the
expense of intervention and action and experiment’’ (Hacking 1983, p. 131,
emphasis added). Other relevant contributions come from Shapin and Schaffer
(1985), Peter Galison (1987), and David Gooding (cf. Gooding et al. 1989) and,
more recently, from Andrew Pickering (1995) and Javier Echeverrı´a (1995). In
didactics of science, Heering (cf. 2007, Heering and Wittje 2011, Heering et al.
2013) has focused on the experimental traditions in the scientific activity and has
advocated for a more careful study of the ‘material cultures’ of science and the uses
of instruments and experiments in the history of science education.
Teaching the Nature of Science 175
One of the most influential authors in this line of new experimentalism has beenIan Hacking, with his critique to positivistic philosophies of science for their‘‘single-minded obsession with representation and thinking and theory, at theexpense of intervention and action and experiment’’ (Hacking 1983, p. 131,emphasis added). Other relevant contributions come from Shapin and Schaffer(1985), Peter Galison (1987), and David Gooding (cf. Gooding et al. 1989) and,more recently, from Andrew Pickering (1995) and Javier Echeverrı´a (1995). Indidactics of science, Heering (cf. 2007, Heering and Wittje 2011, Heering et al.2013) has focused on the experimental traditions in the scientific activity and hasadvocated for a more careful study of the ‘material cultures’ of science and the usesof instruments and experiments in the history of science education.Teaching the Nature of Science 175
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..