The Korea 2030 scenario employs Dator’s alternative futures method that stresses images of the future because these exist everywhere humans live and dominate human culture [32]. He suggests four generic alternative futures: (a) continued growth, (b) collapse, (c) a disciplined society, and (d) a transformational society [33]. This scenario method focuses on developing the preferred future after experiencing examples of the four generic alternative futures. In order to create alternative future scenarios, this study presents four alternative scenario archetypes and one preferred future scenario. As shown in Table 1, four images of the future in Korea are possible. These scenarios first examine the question of what will happen in Korea if it shows continued economic growth, if Korea encounters extreme weather events, if cosmopolitan values permeate all strata of Korean society, and if Korea radically experiences high biotech development. After analyzing these four generic alternative scenarios and assessing their implications, a preferred future scenario is created. This study also employs Inayatullah’s causal layered analysis (CLA) [34] that examines the levels of litany, social causes, the discourse/worldview, and myth/metaphor, for each scenario summary.