At all speeds, the relative duration of the stroke phases was significantly different between the affected and unaffected arm Table II. Mean pull time of the affected arm was significantly longer (P < 0.05; ES = 1.70; 95% CI = 3.66–10.34) than that of the unaffected arm. Consequently, the affected arm’s recovery was significantly shorter (P < 0.05) than that of the unaffected arm. In contrast to the arms, the relative duration of the leg kick phases was not different between the affected and unaffected sides.
Within the group, swimmers used different kick patterns Table III. At 400 m and 100 m pace, nine swimmers used a six-beat kick, three used a four-beat kick and one used an eight-beat kick. At 50 m pace, only one swimmer switched her kick pattern from a four- to a six-beat kick. With the exception of this swimmer, participants did not change their kick pattern as their swimming speed increased.
At all speeds, the relative duration of the stroke phases was significantly different between the affected and unaffected arm Table II. Mean pull time of the affected arm was significantly longer (P < 0.05; ES = 1.70; 95% CI = 3.66–10.34) than that of the unaffected arm. Consequently, the affected arm’s recovery was significantly shorter (P < 0.05) than that of the unaffected arm. In contrast to the arms, the relative duration of the leg kick phases was not different between the affected and unaffected sides.
Within the group, swimmers used different kick patterns Table III. At 400 m and 100 m pace, nine swimmers used a six-beat kick, three used a four-beat kick and one used an eight-beat kick. At 50 m pace, only one swimmer switched her kick pattern from a four- to a six-beat kick. With the exception of this swimmer, participants did not change their kick pattern as their swimming speed increased.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98aba/98abadb1435b0cfbe63f2dabdddc22693678da81" alt=""