Do we need to prepare ourselves for a more urbanised and, therefore, more depressed world? With the following article I wish to stimulate a conversation between urban planning, architecture and neuroscience, in the hope of facilitating a more nuanced understanding of how urban and rural living conditions differentially impact upon our mental health. At a first glance, there are enormous methodological differences between the disciplines of urban planning and neuroscience. Nonetheless, considering the neuroscientific approach to the topic of cities is essential, as from it we can start to understand how city living affects inhabitants’ brain biology and could therefore influence the risk for developing mental disorders. On the bright side, there are also indicators that show a protective aspect of large cities with regards to mental health. Cities, therefore, may lend themselves to facilitating new and appropriate health intervention strategies.
Urban living is on the rise whereas rural living is becoming the exception – in all parts of the world and at an ever-increasing rate. The rapid pace of urbanisation is an important marker of the societal transition at large that has occurred over the past 30 years. Our world is shifting towards an urban, small-family or single household, and at the same time, an ageing society. In the next 30 years we will be faced with the growing challenges specific to our cities’ aged single urban populations.
But urban living is not only about getting older, it is also about getting stressed. Stress is the unspecific physiological and psychological reaction to perceived threats to our physical, psychological or social integrity. And urban living can be threatening if you haven’t enough space of your own, if you experience insufficient security or live under unstable economic conditions. Stress increases with the anticipation of adverse situations and the fear of not having the adequate resources to respond to them. From an evolutionary point of view, stress is the mechanism that prepares us for any ‘fight-or-flight’ reaction, and also causes us to evolve in order to better adapt to our environment. Although not harmful per se, stress may jeopardise our health when stress exposure is chronic or when complete recovery is not possible.
Stress-related health consequences
What does stress do to the body? Our organism has two major hormonal stress systems, the quick responding (within milliseconds) autonomic nervous system, which controls the release of noradrenaline and adrenaline, and the somewhat slower hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) system, which is responsible for the release of cortisol, the ‘stress hormone’. Roughly speaking, the quick system prepares us to react immediately whereas the slow system’s reaction depends on the perceived danger of the situation. Noradrenaline and adrenaline increase the heart rate and decrease the heart rate variability, dilate the respiratory airways and activate blood platelets to coagulate. Cortisol antagonises insulin and thus, under certain conditions of persistent stress-dependent dysregulation of the HPA system, results in a diabetes-like metabolic situation. It restructures body fat, promotes obesity, suppresses the immune system and may have a toxic effect on neurons in certain brain regions, particularly the hippocampus, which is important for memory functions. Repeated exposure to social stress in rats leads to abnormal processing of the so-called ‘TAU protein’ in the hippocampus, a mechanism that plays an important role in the development of Alzheimer’s disease. Stress also leads to the shortening of the ‘protection caps’ at both ends of our chromosomes, called telomeres. At the same time, stress also weakens the enzyme responsible for repairing these protection caps. When the telomeres get too short the cell can no longer divide and the tissue loses its regeneration capacity. The result is premature ageing of the organism.
Urban living and mental health
Living in an urban environment is long known to be a risk factor for psychiatric diseases such as major depression or schizophrenia. This is true even though infrastructure, socioeconomic conditions, nutrition and health care services are clearly better in cities than in rural areas. Higher stress exposure and higher stress vulnerability seem to play a crucial role. Social stress may be the most important factor for the increased risk of mental disorders in urban areas. It may be experienced as social evaluative threat, or as chronic social stress, both of which are likely to occur as a direct consequence of high population densities in cities. As for the impact on mental health, social stress seems to outweigh other urban stressors such as pollution or noise. Living in crowded areas is associated with increased social stress, since the environment becomes less controllable for the individual. Social disparities also become much more prominent in cities and can impose stress on the individual. Further, disturbance of chronobiological rhythmsis is more frequent in cities than in rural areas and has a negative influence on mental health and beyond. A recent meta-analysis showed that urban dwellers have a 20 per cent higher risk of developing anxiety disorders, and a 40 per cent higher risk of developing mood disorders. For schizophrenia, double the risk has been shown, with a ‘dose-response’ relationship for urban exposure and disease risk. Longitudinal studies on patients with schizophrenia indicate that it is urban living and upbringing per se, rather than other epidemiological variables, that increase the risk for mental disorders.
As urbanisation of our world is inevitable, we urgently need to improve our understanding of the threatening – as well as the health protective – factors of urban living. Evidence is beginning to surface that indicates that the urban population shows a stronger brain response to stress, and stronger cognitive impairment under stress. A recent fMRI study in the journal Nature, conducted by a German research group, showed that these effects seem to occur irrespective of age, gender, general health status, marital or income status. In this study, the amygdala (a brain region that regulates emotions such as anxiety and fear) showed higher activation under stress in healthy individuals from large cities compared to their counterparts from rural regions. Interestingly, activation grew with the size of the current home city. Further, activity in another brain region associated with depression, the perigenual anteriour cingular cortex, was positively correlated with the time that an individual had spent in a large city as a child. The more years someone had spent growing up under urban conditions, the more active this brain region tended to be.
Urban stressors during childhood
There is an interesting finding against the converging evidence that adverse conditions in early life can severely impact the developing brain and increase vulnerability to mood disorders in adult life. It has been shown that adverse early-life events can alter the experience-dependent maturation of the stress systems, such as the HPA system. This again results in higher stress vulnerability later in life. Inducing early life stress in rodents (for example, by maternal separation) can result in persistent increase of anxiety-like behaviour and life-long hyperactivity of the HPA system in response to stress. Early-life stress may result in epigenetic changes, which means that the activity of certain genes is altered and may even be inherited by next generations. However, the majority of these studies focus on the effects of adverse experiences such as physical maltreatment, neglect or maternal separation, and not on urban stressors which may affect children’s or parents’ well-being (and therefore influence parental attachment). Thus, further research examining the long-term stress vulnerability effects of urban stressors during childhood is necessary.
Social stress in the city
Another recent study has reported that the size of the amygdala correlates with the size and complexity of an individual’s social network. Other studies have demonstrated the correlation of amygdala activity with the spatial distance between two individuals as well as with anticipated social decline (for example, as a consequence of separation or job loss). What consequence does this have for urban planning? What does that mean in terms of the stress resilience of an increasingly urban population? What are the health consequences of higher social stress exposure and stress vulnerability of urban dwellers, given that stress is the most likely pathophysiological cause of many mental disorders, particularly depression? And from a political perspective, what actions can be taken to protect people living under dense metropolitan conditions from stress and its negative mental impact?
Our brains do not seem to be optimally designed for living under our generation’s urban conditions, in the large, densely-populated metropolises of our world. However, there might be large inter-individual differences of stress vulnerability in an urban environment. For this reason, understanding more about stress-protective factors for city inhabitants might help us to plan appropriate public health strategies. If we assume that stress, most often of a social nature, is the major intermediate variable increasing the risk for mental disorders, then the focus needs to be on identifying and improving our understanding of the most health-threatening social stressors, and how these stressors translate into brain disorders. A look into basic stress research might help: studies show that lack of control, social threat and the fear of losing one’s social status strongly contribute to experiencing stress. These factors have been shown to affect the amygdala and the prefrontal cortex. On the other hand,
เราต้องทำตนเองมากขึ้น urbanised และ จึง มากกว่าหดหู่โลก กับบทความต่อไปนี้ที่ผมต้องการกระตุ้นการสนทนาระหว่างการเมืองการวางแผน สถาปัตยกรรม และประสาทวิทยาศาสตร์ ในหวังของการอำนวยความสะดวกมากขึ้นฉับเข้าใจว่าเขตเมือง และชนบทชีวิตเงื่อนไข differentially ผลกระทบเมื่อสุขภาพจิตของเรา อย่างคร่าว ๆ ครั้งแรก มีมหาศาล methodological แตกสาขาการวางผังเมืองและประสาทวิทยาศาสตร์ กระนั้น พิจารณาวิธี neuroscientific หัวข้อของการเมืองเป็นสิ่งจำเป็น จากนั้นเราสามารถเริ่มต้นเพื่อเข้าใจชีววิทยาของสมองของประชากรกระทบในการใช้ชีวิตในเมือง และดังนั้นสามารถมีอิทธิพลต่อความเสี่ยงในการพัฒนาโรคจิต ด้านสว่าง มีตัวบ่งชี้ที่แสดงด้านป้องกันเมืองใหญ่เกี่ยวกับสุขภาพจิต เมือง ดังนั้น อาจยืมตัวเพื่ออำนวยความสะดวกกลยุทธ์แทรกแซงสุขภาพใหม่ และเหมาะสมพักผ่อนได้เพิ่มขึ้นในขณะที่ชีวิตชนบทเป็น ข้อยกเว้น – ในทุกส่วน ของโลก และมีอัตราที่เคยเพิ่มขึ้น ก้าวอย่างรวดเร็วของของเป็นเครื่องหมายสำคัญเป็นข้อมูลภาพมีขนาดใหญ่ที่เกิดผ่านมา 30 ปี โลกของเราจะขยับ ไปทางเล็กครอบครัวการเมือง หรือหนึ่งในครัว เรือน และ ใน เวลาเดียวกัน เป็นสังคมสูงอายุ ใน 30 ปี เราจะต้องประสบกับความท้าทายเจริญเติบโตของเมืองเราอายุเดียวเมืองประชากรเฉพาะแต่พักผ่อนไม่เพียงเกี่ยวกับการเก่า เกี่ยวกับการได้รับการเน้น ความเครียดเป็นปฏิกิริยาที่สรีรวิทยา และจิตวิทยาที่ unspecific การคุกคามด้านการรับรู้ถึงความสมบูรณ์ทางกายภาพ จิตใจ หรือสังคมของเรา และพักผ่อนสามารถคุกคาม ถ้าคุณยังไม่เพียงพอพื้นที่ของตัวเอง ถ้าคุณมีประสบการณ์รักษาความปลอดภัยไม่เพียงพอ หรืออยู่ภายใต้ภาวะเศรษฐกิจที่ไม่เสถียร ความเครียดเพิ่มขึ้นกับความคาดหมายสถานการณ์ร้ายและกลัวไม่มีทรัพยากรเพียงพอที่จะตอบ จากการวิวัฒนาการมอง ความเครียดเป็นกลไกที่เราเตรียมสำหรับปฏิกิริยาใด ๆ 'ต่อสู้ หรือบิน' และยัง ทำให้เราสามารถพัฒนาเพื่อปรับให้เข้ากับสภาพแวดล้อมของเราดีกว่า ไม่เป็นอันตรายต่อ se แม้ว่าความเครียดอาจ jeopardise สุขภาพของเราเมื่อสัมผัสความเครียดเรื้อรัง หรือ เมื่อไม่สามารถกู้คืนเสร็จสมบูรณ์ ผลกระทบสุขภาพที่เกี่ยวข้องกับความเครียดความเครียดทำให้ร่างกายอะไร สิ่งมีชีวิตของเรามีความเครียดฮอร์โมนหลักสองระบบ รวดเร็วตอบสนอง (ภายในมิลลิวินาที) ระบบประสาทอัตโนมัติ การควบคุมของ noradrenaline และตื่นเต้น และค่อนข้างช้า hypothalamus-ต่อมใต้สมอง-adrenocortical (HPA) ระบบ ที่รับผิดชอบของ cortisol 'ฮอร์โมนความเครียด' พูดหยาบ ๆ ระบบด่วนเตรียมการตอบสนองทันทีในขณะที่ปฏิกิริยาของระบบช้าขึ้นอยู่กับอันตรายรับรู้สถานการณ์ของเรา Noradrenaline และตื่นเต้นเพิ่มอัตราการเต้นหัวใจลดความแปรผันของอัตราการเต้นหัวใจ เบิกบินหายใจ และเลือดเกล็ดเลือดจะจับตัวเป็นการเปิดใช้งาน Cortisol antagonises อินซูลิน และดัง ภายใต้เงื่อนไขบางประการของ dysregulation ขึ้นอยู่กับความเครียดแบบระบบ HPA ผลในสถานการณ์ที่เผาผลาญเหมือนโรคเบาหวาน มัน restructures ไขมันในร่างกาย ส่งเสริมโรคอ้วน ไม่ใส่ระบบภูมิคุ้มกัน และอาจมีผลเป็นพิษ neurons บางสมองภูมิภาค โดยเฉพาะอย่างยิ่งการฮิพโพแคมปัส ซึ่งเป็นสิ่งสำคัญสำหรับการทำงานหน่วยความจำ สัมผัสซ้ำในหนูที่มีความเครียดทางสังคมนำไปสู่การประมวลผลที่ผิดปกติเรียกว่า 'เต่าโปรตีน' ฮิพโพแคมปัส กลไกที่มีบทบาทสำคัญในการพัฒนาของโรคอัลไซเมอร์ ความเครียดยังนำไปทำให้สั้นของ 'ป้องกันหมวก' ที่ปลายทั้งสองของเรา chromosomes เรียกว่า telomeres ในเวลาเดียวกัน ความเครียดยังอ่อนเอนไซม์ชอบซ่อมหมวกเหล่านี้ป้องกัน เมื่อการ telomeres สั้นเกินไป ไม่สามารถแบ่งเซลล์ และเนื้อเยื่อสูญเสียของกำลังฟื้นฟู ผลดีของการมีชีวิตอยู่Urban living and mental healthLiving in an urban environment is long known to be a risk factor for psychiatric diseases such as major depression or schizophrenia. This is true even though infrastructure, socioeconomic conditions, nutrition and health care services are clearly better in cities than in rural areas. Higher stress exposure and higher stress vulnerability seem to play a crucial role. Social stress may be the most important factor for the increased risk of mental disorders in urban areas. It may be experienced as social evaluative threat, or as chronic social stress, both of which are likely to occur as a direct consequence of high population densities in cities. As for the impact on mental health, social stress seems to outweigh other urban stressors such as pollution or noise. Living in crowded areas is associated with increased social stress, since the environment becomes less controllable for the individual. Social disparities also become much more prominent in cities and can impose stress on the individual. Further, disturbance of chronobiological rhythmsis is more frequent in cities than in rural areas and has a negative influence on mental health and beyond. A recent meta-analysis showed that urban dwellers have a 20 per cent higher risk of developing anxiety disorders, and a 40 per cent higher risk of developing mood disorders. For schizophrenia, double the risk has been shown, with a ‘dose-response’ relationship for urban exposure and disease risk. Longitudinal studies on patients with schizophrenia indicate that it is urban living and upbringing per se, rather than other epidemiological variables, that increase the risk for mental disorders.As urbanisation of our world is inevitable, we urgently need to improve our understanding of the threatening – as well as the health protective – factors of urban living. Evidence is beginning to surface that indicates that the urban population shows a stronger brain response to stress, and stronger cognitive impairment under stress. A recent fMRI study in the journal Nature, conducted by a German research group, showed that these effects seem to occur irrespective of age, gender, general health status, marital or income status. In this study, the amygdala (a brain region that regulates emotions such as anxiety and fear) showed higher activation under stress in healthy individuals from large cities compared to their counterparts from rural regions. Interestingly, activation grew with the size of the current home city. Further, activity in another brain region associated with depression, the perigenual anteriour cingular cortex, was positively correlated with the time that an individual had spent in a large city as a child. The more years someone had spent growing up under urban conditions, the more active this brain region tended to be.Urban stressors during childhoodThere is an interesting finding against the converging evidence that adverse conditions in early life can severely impact the developing brain and increase vulnerability to mood disorders in adult life. It has been shown that adverse early-life events can alter the experience-dependent maturation of the stress systems, such as the HPA system. This again results in higher stress vulnerability later in life. Inducing early life stress in rodents (for example, by maternal separation) can result in persistent increase of anxiety-like behaviour and life-long hyperactivity of the HPA system in response to stress. Early-life stress may result in epigenetic changes, which means that the activity of certain genes is altered and may even be inherited by next generations. However, the majority of these studies focus on the effects of adverse experiences such as physical maltreatment, neglect or maternal separation, and not on urban stressors which may affect children’s or parents’ well-being (and therefore influence parental attachment). Thus, further research examining the long-term stress vulnerability effects of urban stressors during childhood is necessary.Social stress in the cityAnother recent study has reported that the size of the amygdala correlates with the size and complexity of an individual’s social network. Other studies have demonstrated the correlation of amygdala activity with the spatial distance between two individuals as well as with anticipated social decline (for example, as a consequence of separation or job loss). What consequence does this have for urban planning? What does that mean in terms of the stress resilience of an increasingly urban population? What are the health consequences of higher social stress exposure and stress vulnerability of urban dwellers, given that stress is the most likely pathophysiological cause of many mental disorders, particularly depression? And from a political perspective, what actions can be taken to protect people living under dense metropolitan conditions from stress and its negative mental impact?Our brains do not seem to be optimally designed for living under our generation’s urban conditions, in the large, densely-populated metropolises of our world. However, there might be large inter-individual differences of stress vulnerability in an urban environment. For this reason, understanding more about stress-protective factors for city inhabitants might help us to plan appropriate public health strategies. If we assume that stress, most often of a social nature, is the major intermediate variable increasing the risk for mental disorders, then the focus needs to be on identifying and improving our understanding of the most health-threatening social stressors, and how these stressors translate into brain disorders. A look into basic stress research might help: studies show that lack of control, social threat and the fear of losing one’s social status strongly contribute to experiencing stress. These factors have been shown to affect the amygdala and the prefrontal cortex. On the other hand,
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..