Before doing requested changes I did a spot check and noticed in my sample (see attachment) that around 50% of requested changes are unnecessary as proposed Moving Average Price (MAP) is equal with existing MAP. What is the reason for including these materials in the list? Please review your data and send an amended list. Further you should have a look at the other attachment where I listed materials with either strange procurement type OR strange price control. Finally I propose to use query ZFIG_GL_MASTER01 - Material Master consistency checks to analyze your material parameters (e.g. MAP).
Kind regards,