which may be interested in having everything built new (because that worked out so well in Sochi) or want a cheaper option, according to the Daily News, and LA's spread-out nature could also be a serious security clusterfuck. After seeing the turmoil in Sochi, all the issues with incomplete facilities and the environmental destruction wrought on the way, why should LA even want to host the games? For starters, it set the precedent for doing it right (financially, anyway).