PACT Overall PACTscores are reported to candidates and programs on a scale of 1 to 4.
However, there is considerable detail in the analytic scoring scheme that is used to
evaluate PACT portfolios. Subscale scores are developed fromscores on a set of guiding
questions under each category (planning, instruction, assessment, reflection, and academic
language); each of the guiding questions is also rated on a scale of 1 to 4. To take
advantage of the full amount of information available, we computed subscale scores as
the sum of scores for all the guiding questions within that scale and a total score as the
sum of all of the subscale scores. Thus, the highest possible total score for the PACT
would be 44 points.When teachers had more than one PACT score (which occurred
when a few candidates took part both in the initial pilot conducted for test validation and
also in the later finished assessment), the mean scores for all PACT assessments were
used. Missing items were imputed using mean imputation, imputing the mean value for
others who took the same PACT subject assessment. Data were mostly complete.
Imputation was implemented using all PACT teachers linked to these districts. Of 242
teachers so linked, at most five teachers were missing any given item. The PACT scores
for ELA and math teachers are summarized in Table 1.
questions about their preparation, the sources of support they received for completing
the PACT assessment, and their perceptions of the educational value of the PACT for
their own development as teachers. For this article, we used the surveys completed by
305 PACT candidates from eight programs who participated in PACT pilots in 2005.
PACT Overall PACTscores are reported to candidates and programs on a scale of 1 to 4.
However, there is considerable detail in the analytic scoring scheme that is used to
evaluate PACT portfolios. Subscale scores are developed fromscores on a set of guiding
questions under each category (planning, instruction, assessment, reflection, and academic
language); each of the guiding questions is also rated on a scale of 1 to 4. To take
advantage of the full amount of information available, we computed subscale scores as
the sum of scores for all the guiding questions within that scale and a total score as the
sum of all of the subscale scores. Thus, the highest possible total score for the PACT
would be 44 points.When teachers had more than one PACT score (which occurred
when a few candidates took part both in the initial pilot conducted for test validation and
also in the later finished assessment), the mean scores for all PACT assessments were
used. Missing items were imputed using mean imputation, imputing the mean value for
others who took the same PACT subject assessment. Data were mostly complete.
Imputation was implemented using all PACT teachers linked to these districts. Of 242
teachers so linked, at most five teachers were missing any given item. The PACT scores
for ELA and math teachers are summarized in Table 1.
questions about their preparation, the sources of support they received for completing
the PACT assessment, and their perceptions of the educational value of the PACT for
their own development as teachers. For this article, we used the surveys completed by
305 PACT candidates from eight programs who participated in PACT pilots in 2005.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98aba/98abadb1435b0cfbe63f2dabdddc22693678da81" alt=""
PACT Overall PACTscores are reported to candidates and programs on a scale of 1 to 4.
However, there is considerable detail in the analytic scoring scheme that is used to
evaluate PACT portfolios. Subscale scores are developed fromscores on a set of guiding
questions under each category (planning, instruction, assessment, reflection, and academic
language); each of the guiding questions is also rated on a scale of 1 to 4. To take
advantage of the full amount of information available, we computed subscale scores as
the sum of scores for all the guiding questions within that scale and a total score as the
sum of all of the subscale scores. Thus, the highest possible total score for the PACT
would be 44 points.When teachers had more than one PACT score (which occurred
when a few candidates took part both in the initial pilot conducted for test validation and
also in the later finished assessment), the mean scores for all PACT assessments were
used. Missing items were imputed using mean imputation, imputing the mean value for
others who took the same PACT subject assessment. Data were mostly complete.
Imputation was implemented using all PACT teachers linked to these districts. Of 242
teachers so linked, at most five teachers were missing any given item. The PACT scores
for ELA and math teachers are summarized in Table 1.
questions about their preparation, the sources of support they received for completing
the PACT assessment, and their perceptions of the educational value of the PACT for
their own development as teachers. For this article, we used the surveys completed by
305 PACT candidates from eight programs who participated in PACT pilots in 2005.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98aba/98abadb1435b0cfbe63f2dabdddc22693678da81" alt=""