The two groups were then compared with regard to various baseline and obstetric characteristics and the development of GDM later in their pregnancy.
Relative risk and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was estimated. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were also compared.
Descriptive statistics were used to describe patients’ characteristics.
Student t test and Chi-square test were used in the comparison between the two groups as appropriate. Relative risk and 95%CI were estimated.
Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine independent associated factors, adjusted for potential confounders. Adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) and 95%CI were estimated.
A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.