During the time that IceTag sensors and
HR
monitors
were
applied,
a
CCTV
camera
(VC-C50i;
Canon
U.S.A.,
Inc.,
Lake
Success,
NY,
USA)
was
sit-
uated
above
each
pen
to
record
activity
of
animals
from
07:00
h
to
19:00
h
(hours
with
natural
or
artificial
light).
Recordings
(Mpeg)
were
coded
using
the
Observer
XT
Version
10.5
(Noldus
Information
Technology,
Wageningen,
The
Netherlands).
Coded
variables
were
aggressive
behav-
iors
and
the
duration
of
waiting.
Aggressive
behaviors
encoded
as
point
events
included
prodding,
mounting,
head
butting,
and
chasing,
which
were
categorized
as
intra-
or
inter-aggressive.
Intra-aggressive
behavior
was
defined
as
when
a
wether
showed
an
aggressive
behavior
to
another
wether
in
the
same
pen,
whereas
inter-aggressive
behaviors
involved
ani-
mals
in
an
adjacent
pen
separated
by
the
wire
mesh
metal
panels.
When
a
series
of
aggressive
actions
continued
for
more
than
1
min,
it
was
counted
as
a
second
point
event.
Waiting
was
coded
as
a
state
event
when
a
wether
was
within
(i.e.,
all
four
hooves)
a
fixed
waiting
area,
2.0
m
length
in
front
of
the
feeder
entrance
and
0.9
m
width
from
the
feeder
on
one
side,
during
which
time
the
feeder
was
occupied
by
another
wether.
The
other
side
of
the
feeder
was
adjacent
to
the
wire
mesh
panel
separating
the
pen
from
the
hallway.
During the time that IceTag sensors andHRmonitorswereapplied,aCCTVcamera(VC-C50i;CanonU.S.A.,Inc.,LakeSuccess,NY,USA)wassit-uatedaboveeachpentorecordactivityofanimalsfrom07:00hto19:00h(hourswithnaturalorartificiallight).Recordings(Mpeg)werecodedusingtheObserverXTVersion10.5(NoldusInformationTechnology,Wageningen,TheNetherlands).Codedvariableswereaggressivebehav-iorsandthedurationofwaiting.Aggressivebehaviorsencodedaspointeventsincludedprodding,mounting,headbutting,andchasing,whichwerecategorizedasintra-orinter-aggressive.Intra-aggressivebehaviorwasdefinedaswhenawethershowedanaggressivebehaviortoanotherwetherinthesamepen,whereasinter-aggressivebehaviorsinvolvedani-malsinanadjacentpenseparatedbythewiremeshmetalpanels.Whenaseriesofaggressiveactionscontinuedformorethan1min,itwascountedasasecondpointevent.Waitingwascodedasastateeventwhenawetherwaswithin(i.e.,allfourhooves)afixedwaitingarea,2.0mlengthinfrontofthefeederentranceand0.9mwidthfromthefeederononeside,duringwhichtimethefeederwasoccupiedbyanotherwether.Theอื่น ๆด้านข้างของที่ถาดป้อนกระดาษถูกอยู่ติดกันถึงที่ลวดตาข่ายแผงแยกที่ปากกาจากที่ห้องโถง
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98aba/98abadb1435b0cfbe63f2dabdddc22693678da81" alt=""
ในช่วงเวลาที่เซ็นเซอร์ IceTag and
HR
monitors
were
applied,
a
CCTV
camera
(VC-C50i;
Canon
U.SA,
Inc.,
Lake
Success,
NY,
USA)
was
sit-
uated
above
each
pen
to
record
activity
of
animals
from
07:00
h
to
19:00
h
(hours
with
natural
or
artificial
light).
Recordings
(Mpeg)
were
coded
using
the
Observer
XT
Version
10.5
(Noldus
Information
Technology,
Wageningen,
The
Netherlands).
Coded
variables
were
aggressive
behav-
iors
and
the
duration
of
waiting.
Aggressive
behaviors
encoded
as
point
events
included
prodding,
mounting,
head
butting,
and
chasing,
which
were
categorized
as
intra-
or
inter-aggressive.
Intra-aggressive
behavior
was
defined
as
when
a
wether
showed
an
aggressive
behavior
to
another
wether
in
the
same
pen,
whereas
inter-aggressive
behaviors
involved
ani-
mals
in
an
adjacent
pen
separated
by
the
wire
mesh
metal
panels.
When
a
series
of
aggressive
actions
continued
for
more
than
1
min,
it
was
counted
as
a
second
point
event.
Waiting
was
coded
as
a
state
event
when
a
wether
was
within
(ie,
all
four
hooves)
a
fixed
waiting
area,
2.0
m
length
in
front
of
the
feeder
entrance
and
0.9
m
width
from
the
feeder
on
one
side,
during
which
time
the
feeder
was
occupied
by
another
wether.
The
other
side
of
the
feeder
was
adjacent
to
the
wire
mesh
panel
separating
the
pen
from
the
hallway.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98aba/98abadb1435b0cfbe63f2dabdddc22693678da81" alt=""