It very much focused on racial variation and human osteological development. In England,physical anthropological interests were most, were more closely aligned with paleontology,evolution, and archaeology, rather than strictly medical training, and therefore, lean moretowards what today we consider paleoanthropology.
Paul Broca who we, we, Paul Broca who we will discuss later in the semester related to the region of the brain associated with language,founded four anthropological societies in France between 1859 and 1872.
He incorporated many of Morton's ideas into his own. As you may recall, and we will discuss later, Morton and Hrdlicka were American, this suggests that there was quite a lot of communication between anthropologists, such as there were, on both sides of the pond.
In England, Thomas Huxley, who was a Darwinian evolutionist, published the first text on physical anthropology in 1863.
It was called Evidence as to Man's Place in Nature, and included information on comparative primate anatomy, fossil evidence for human evolution, and information on the natural history of non-human primates.
Huxley later went on to study modern human variation.
Francis Galton, an English biometrician, so somebody who measures living things, began looking at human development in 1873.
Germany had largest numbers, and the strongest scientific establishment of physical anthropologists,
both before and after World War I.
But much of the history associated with the field has been tarnished by antisemitism, and extremely racist approaches to the study of humans, even compared to contemporaries in other countries. To the extent that there's not a lot of widely
available, information on this period, all of which started around 1880's
Which is, also when the discipline became firmly established in German academia.
Then following on that, in 1890, Arthur Keith who was British, published his observation on gibbons in Thailand.
Which was one of the very first studies on primate behavior in the wild. So that's more or less where we are at the beginning of the 20th century, where the discipline becomes more professionalized, and we have the new physical anthropology.
The 20th century up into several shorter time periods as recognizable academic generations started to be produced in American physical anthropology.
One of the major themes throughout the 20th century, in contrast to the 19th. Is that there was more emphasis in training
students, and influencing future academic directions, rather than on individual works boost, especially because there was somewhat of a bottleneck in American physical anthropology, with only one person, Earnest Hooton.
Training students throughout the first half of the century. The focus of physical anthropology, to a certain extent, shifted after World War II, as the United States began to train more students on physical anthropology, than Germany.
At the turn of the century, through at the turn of the century in France, Leonce-Pierre Manouvier, which I'm sure I just butchered.
Who was one of Broca's students, helped train Hrdlicka, who would later be very influential in the US.
And worked on human cranial sexual dimorphism, as well as other osteological issues.
Rudolf Martin, a Swiss anthropologist at Zürich, wrote the handbook of physical anthropology, the original title is in German, something.
Which was the main reference book throughout the early 20th century, for physical anthropologists.
It was published in 1940. So, right at the beginning of World War 1. English scientists rthur Keith and Grafton Elliot Smith, made significant contributions to comparative primate anatomy, as well as tra, as well as training T Wingate Todd and Earnest A Hooton, who also later became very influential in U.S Physical anthropology.
Franz Boas, Boas, Franz Boas, who you may remember from 201 as the father of American anthropology, and a major contributor to. Franz Boas who you may remember from 201 as the father of American anthropology and a major contributor to cultural anthropology conducted experiments in 1912 which show, which showed that races weren't that mutable, with changes in immigrants symbolic index averages, from one generation to the next.
This was significant because that was actually one of the measures that had been used, to classify races before this time. In the inter warriors 1918 through 1939, Rudolph Martin, the Swish, the Swiss National we talked about a minute ago, moved to Germany in 1918 where he worked on human growth and development.
Field primatology began to develop as a distinct area of interest with multidisciplinary, with a multidisciplinary study of gibbons in Thailand, in 1937, led by psychologist Ra
It very much focused on racial variation and human osteological development. In England,physical anthropological interests were most, were more closely aligned with paleontology,evolution, and archaeology, rather than strictly medical training, and therefore, lean moretowards what today we consider paleoanthropology. Paul Broca who we, we, Paul Broca who we will discuss later in the semester related to the region of the brain associated with language,founded four anthropological societies in France between 1859 and 1872.He incorporated many of Morton's ideas into his own. As you may recall, and we will discuss later, Morton and Hrdlicka were American, this suggests that there was quite a lot of communication between anthropologists, such as there were, on both sides of the pond.In England, Thomas Huxley, who was a Darwinian evolutionist, published the first text on physical anthropology in 1863.It was called Evidence as to Man's Place in Nature, and included information on comparative primate anatomy, fossil evidence for human evolution, and information on the natural history of non-human primates. Huxley later went on to study modern human variation.Francis Galton, an English biometrician, so somebody who measures living things, began looking at human development in 1873.Germany had largest numbers, and the strongest scientific establishment of physical anthropologists,both before and after World War I. But much of the history associated with the field has been tarnished by antisemitism, and extremely racist approaches to the study of humans, even compared to contemporaries in other countries. To the extent that there's not a lot of widelyavailable, information on this period, all of which started around 1880'sWhich is, also when the discipline became firmly established in German academia. Then following on that, in 1890, Arthur Keith who was British, published his observation on gibbons in Thailand. Which was one of the very first studies on primate behavior in the wild. So that's more or less where we are at the beginning of the 20th century, where the discipline becomes more professionalized, and we have the new physical anthropology.The 20th century up into several shorter time periods as recognizable academic generations started to be produced in American physical anthropology. One of the major themes throughout the 20th century, in contrast to the 19th. Is that there was more emphasis in trainingstudents, and influencing future academic directions, rather than on individual works boost, especially because there was somewhat of a bottleneck in American physical anthropology, with only one person, Earnest Hooton.Training students throughout the first half of the century. The focus of physical anthropology, to a certain extent, shifted after World War II, as the United States began to train more students on physical anthropology, than Germany. At the turn of the century, through at the turn of the century in France, Leonce-Pierre Manouvier, which I'm sure I just butchered.Who was one of Broca's students, helped train Hrdlicka, who would later be very influential in the US. And worked on human cranial sexual dimorphism, as well as other osteological issues.Rudolf Martin, a Swiss anthropologist at Zürich, wrote the handbook of physical anthropology, the original title is in German, something.Which was the main reference book throughout the early 20th century, for physical anthropologists. It was published in 1940. So, right at the beginning of World War 1. English scientists rthur Keith and Grafton Elliot Smith, made significant contributions to comparative primate anatomy, as well as tra, as well as training T Wingate Todd and Earnest A Hooton, who also later became very influential in U.S Physical anthropology.Franz Boas, Boas, Franz Boas, who you may remember from 201 as the father of American anthropology, and a major contributor to. Franz Boas who you may remember from 201 as the father of American anthropology and a major contributor to cultural anthropology conducted experiments in 1912 which show, which showed that races weren't that mutable, with changes in immigrants symbolic index averages, from one generation to the next.This was significant because that was actually one of the measures that had been used, to classify races before this time. In the inter warriors 1918 through 1939, Rudolph Martin, the Swish, the Swiss National we talked about a minute ago, moved to Germany in 1918 where he worked on human growth and development.Field primatology began to develop as a distinct area of interest with multidisciplinary, with a multidisciplinary study of gibbons in Thailand, in 1937, led by psychologist Ra
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
