In fact, green practices are perceived to be unfavorable to business because Chan and Fang (2007) present evidence on the absence of relationship between eco-design initiative and economic benefits whereas Eltayeb et al. (2010) revealed no direct relationship between reverse logistics and economic outcome. Based on Khor and Zulkifli (2012), they defined reverse logistics activities distinctively and revealed that repair and recycling options positive affects firm’s profitability. As the obscured benefits of reusables in closed-loop supply chain are evident, this study reaffirmed their assertion by analyzing green product designing vigilantly. Based on the aforementioned discussion, design for disassembly is an elementary characteristic that significantly alleviate the complexities related to reverse logistics product disposition whereas design for environment minimize the risks of pollution due to exposure of hazardous emission. This findings is imperative because the business approach towards returns are evolving from ‘cost of doing businesses’ to ‘value creation’ as a result of maturing drivers of reverse logistics, including society, regulations, resources and information (Krikke et al., 2013).