Finally, an analysis of the manner component was conducted. In contrast to path and goal, manner
could always be imitated accurately despite the differences in the ramps, and participants did so accurately
75% of the time. A paired t test comparing the average rate of matching each manner found no
significant difference between their imitation rates of hopping (73%) and sliding (78%). Because manner
could co-occur with the other components, we looked to see whether accurate imitation of manner
correlated with the choice to imitate either path or goal. A positive correlation was found between
manner and path, r = .421, p = .013, with participants being more likely to correctly imitate manner
when they also imitated the path than when they also imitated the goal.
Finally, an analysis of the manner component was conducted. In contrast to path and goal, manner
could always be imitated accurately despite the differences in the ramps, and participants did so accurately
75% of the time. A paired t test comparing the average rate of matching each manner found no
significant difference between their imitation rates of hopping (73%) and sliding (78%). Because manner
could co-occur with the other components, we looked to see whether accurate imitation of manner
correlated with the choice to imitate either path or goal. A positive correlation was found between
manner and path, r = .421, p = .013, with participants being more likely to correctly imitate manner
when they also imitated the path than when they also imitated the goal.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
