Both subjects responded most slowly to the auditory predicted cues. Faster reaction times to auditory random without cues might have resulted because the subjects were focused since they knew they would not be prompted. The prompted auditory cue warned subjects about the imminent proceeding cue. In contrary, the auditory predicted cue required that the subjects multitask counting the predicted times and signaling the cues. Perhaps if subjects had access to digital time keepers which would eliminate the need to mentally keep track of time, their reactions times to auditory predicted cues would be more similar to auditory prompted cues.