Some people fear that Gilligan’s attempt to establish a different but equal voice merely reinforces the cultural stereotype that men act on reason while women respond to feelings. Others censure Gilligan for swallowing the anger that many women feel. They note that her "voice of care" takes care not to accuse men of anything more than ignorance or insensitivity to a feminine perspective. Many ethical theorists are disturbed at the idea of a double standard-justice for some, care for others. Moral philosophy has never suggested different ethics for different groups. Each ethical theory assumes a moral standard that applies to all. People who think in terms of justice often object that Gilligan’s ethic of care has no external criteria by which to judge whether people have met their responsibility. For example, on what basis does Gilligan assign Sarah’s explanation to Level 3 rather than considering it a selfish rationalization more characteristic of Level l? How can we tell that the woman has taken responsibility for her choice?