The kappa statistical value of the automated analysis techniques used showed varying levels of agreement. The SVM algorithm exhibited the highest kappa value of 0.64, indicating a substantial level of agreement. The RF algorithm fell within the moderate range of agreement. The remaining algorithm, namely supervised classification, k-NN, and GMM, all exhibited fair levels of agreement. Notably, the visual interpretation technique displayed an exceptionally high level of agreement, with a kappa value more than 0.81, indicating almost perfect agreement.