of learners. The data gathered is in the form of test
scores of students, which are employed to compare
student’s achievements. The decision about the
programme is made on the basis of this comparison.
In the humanistic approach, the evaluator uses data
obtained from thick descriptions of actual events. Data
is also obtained from interviews with the participants in
the curriculum programme and is utilized for the purposes
of evaluation.
v EVALUATION MODELS :
Evaluation models are categorized (i) Curriculum Product
Evaluation and (ii) Curriculum Programme Evaluation.
i)Curriculum Product Evaluation : If focuses on
products such as course of study, syllabi, text-book
etc. This type of curriculum product evaluation
employees specified external criteria. In this sense,
curriculum evaluation is an examination of the adequacy
of the curriculum product based on derived
characteristics describing appropriateness. There are
two models under this category.
(a) “The Eight Year Study” Evaluation Model :
This model offers an example curriculum product
evaluation characteristics, such as adequacy of teacher’s
manual for class-room application and for providing
explanation as to the content-selecting sequence,
presentation, effectiveness of curriculum material and
specification of instructional objectives.
The steps in evaluation as recommended by Tayler
(1949) were as follow :
1. Establishment of broader goals of the programme.
2. Classification and definition of objectives is
behavioural terms. 3. Identification of situations where
the achievement of the objectives is indicated.4.
Development of measurement techniques.5. Collection
of student performance date. 6. Comparison of data
with behaviorally stated objectives.
(b) Provus’ Discrepancy Evaluation Model :
1. Determining programme standards 2. Determining
programme performance 3. Comparing the performance
with standards. 4. Determining whether a discrepancy
exists between performance and standards. In this model
the programme, in operation, is constantly judged in
terms of fixed standard criteria already established.
(ii) Curriculum programme Evaluation :
The term curriculum programme evaluation refers to
a complex set of interactions between a given
instructional programme and its setting (Omstein &
Hunkins, 1988). This is concerned with looking at how
a particular curriculum works within its instructional
setting. It also points out towards the methods to be
used for data collection by means of class-room
observations, interviews and documentary analysis.
Under this category, there are two models which are as
of learners. The data gathered is in the form of test
scores of students, which are employed to compare
student’s achievements. The decision about the
programme is made on the basis of this comparison.
In the humanistic approach, the evaluator uses data
obtained from thick descriptions of actual events. Data
is also obtained from interviews with the participants in
the curriculum programme and is utilized for the purposes
of evaluation.
v EVALUATION MODELS :
Evaluation models are categorized (i) Curriculum Product
Evaluation and (ii) Curriculum Programme Evaluation.
i)Curriculum Product Evaluation : If focuses on
products such as course of study, syllabi, text-book
etc. This type of curriculum product evaluation
employees specified external criteria. In this sense,
curriculum evaluation is an examination of the adequacy
of the curriculum product based on derived
characteristics describing appropriateness. There are
two models under this category.
(a) “The Eight Year Study” Evaluation Model :
This model offers an example curriculum product
evaluation characteristics, such as adequacy of teacher’s
manual for class-room application and for providing
explanation as to the content-selecting sequence,
presentation, effectiveness of curriculum material and
specification of instructional objectives.
The steps in evaluation as recommended by Tayler
(1949) were as follow :
1. Establishment of broader goals of the programme.
2. Classification and definition of objectives is
behavioural terms. 3. Identification of situations where
the achievement of the objectives is indicated.4.
Development of measurement techniques.5. Collection
of student performance date. 6. Comparison of data
with behaviorally stated objectives.
(b) Provus’ Discrepancy Evaluation Model :
1. Determining programme standards 2. Determining
programme performance 3. Comparing the performance
with standards. 4. Determining whether a discrepancy
exists between performance and standards. In this model
the programme, in operation, is constantly judged in
terms of fixed standard criteria already established.
(ii) Curriculum programme Evaluation :
The term curriculum programme evaluation refers to
a complex set of interactions between a given
instructional programme and its setting (Omstein &
Hunkins, 1988). This is concerned with looking at how
a particular curriculum works within its instructional
setting. It also points out towards the methods to be
used for data collection by means of class-room
observations, interviews and documentary analysis.
Under this category, there are two models which are as
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..