Schnotz and Kürschner (2007) echo this idea by stating that techniques to simply reduce cognitive load can be counterproductive. They argue that learning tasks should be adapted to the learner’s zone of proximal development which in turn depends on the learner’s level of expertise, and that intrinsic and germane cognitive load should be promoted while extraneous
cognitive load is reduced. De Jong (2010) states that the three main recommendations that cognitive load theory has contributed to the field of instructional design are: “present material that aligns with the prior knowledge of the learner (intrinsic load), avoid non- essential and confusing information (extraneous load), and stimulate processes that lead to conceptually rich and deep knowledge (germane load)” (p. 111). These cognitive load processes occur simultaneously in working memory, are limited in capacity, and can only occur at the expense of the other two. If
true, this creates important considerations for multimedia learning.
Schnotz and Kürschner (2007) echo this idea by stating that techniques to simply reduce cognitive load can be counterproductive. They argue that learning tasks should be adapted to the learner’s zone of proximal development which in turn depends on the learner’s level of expertise, and that intrinsic and germane cognitive load should be promoted while extraneouscognitive load is reduced. De Jong (2010) states that the three main recommendations that cognitive load theory has contributed to the field of instructional design are: “present material that aligns with the prior knowledge of the learner (intrinsic load), avoid non- essential and confusing information (extraneous load), and stimulate processes that lead to conceptually rich and deep knowledge (germane load)” (p. 111). These cognitive load processes occur simultaneously in working memory, are limited in capacity, and can only occur at the expense of the other two. Iftrue, this creates important considerations for multimedia learning.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
