As I see it, considerable tension has been generated between the international obligation of courts in all Contracting States to have regard to foreign CISG case law,63 and the strong Danish judicial tradition of formulating premises so brief that they sometimes shed little light on the decision's underlying rationale (ratio decidendi).64 Indeed, as far as I know, no Danish court has itself ever cited a for- eign CISG case,' and that conspicuous omission obviously makes it difficult to determine whether Danish courts actually have (any) regard for foreign CISG case law. Conversely, that same omission - as well as the lack of other relevant information in Danish judgments - also decreases the likelihood that foreign courts will have much regard for Danish CISG case law.