Collective implementation
The importance of interdependency, communication and facilitation during execution
of the plans was revealed in the case studies.
The concept of interdependency was commonly practiced in both cases. As an
example, the project “B” architect and contractor both depended on each other for
producing drawings and performance, even before initiating a contractual
arrangement. This continued at the implementation stage. For example, the architect
of project “A” disclosed that “commitment of general contractor towards LEED
procedures was high. They had taken every step to adhere within the LEED protocols.
Therefore, sub-contractors and suppliers also followed the procedures. As an example
suppliers cleaned their truck tires before leaving the site according to the sustainable
sites pre-requisite of LEED scorecard”.
With increased interdependency, cross-functional activities between team members
of various professions were frequently seen on the two LEED projects. Most of the team
members highlighted the importance of good communication in such activities. It was
revealed that each member of the team should be able to clearly communicate their
contribution to build up the overall implementation plan.
Interviews revealed the importance of the facilitation for planning and
implementation. In fact client was seen as the main facilitator. For example,
according to the LEED consultant of project “A”, the client engaged them at a very
early stage and facilitated them in making major decisions and their implementation
over the project towards LEED certification. According to the experience of the
architect of project “B”, “client involvement for the project was extensive. There were
two representatives from the client on design and administration matters. Therefore it
was an advantage for the project to make quick decisions with representatives of
professional backgrounds”.