Any system of use data collection must be based on scientifically sound methodology.
Because of the challenges described, and others, collection of these data from all of the
thousands of farms in the U.S. is not feasible. One option that could give scientific
credibility to the use data could be the development of an on-going, statistically valid
survey of pork producers.
One model that is already in place is the National Animal Health Monitoring System
(NAHMS). The USDA conducts a periodic survey of a statistically-based sample of
producers taking into account the variety of production types, sizes and locations in the
U.S. Discovering a way to enable NAHMS or a similarly structured program to
systematically and routinely survey use data from pork producers could provide that
information as well as information on other animal health issues.
A reasonable and cooperative method of collecting, interpreting and reporting the
results would need to be developed among all stakeholders, including pork producers. The
collection and reporting of use data in this manner would require its interpretation by
experts knowledgeable in pork production in order to give a clearer understanding of the
data and its advantages and limitations.
If, based on sound science, additional information on antibiotic use is considered
necessary, stakeholders should discuss the best implementation strategies to achieve the
desired result. Producers continue in their science-based commitment to ensure the safety
of pork and to maintain consumer confidence.