To demonstrate absence of a clear sequence of “aftershocks” after the felt foreshock (ML = 5.14) on December 6, 2003, we further examined the following aftershocks from each of 58 intermediate earthquakes with magnitudes between 5.0 and 5.3 from 1990 to 2004. For each intermediate earthquake, the number of the following smaller earthquakes that occurred within the following 24 h at the distances less than 15 km is counted. Under such a criterion, most (∼76%) of intermediate earthquakes were followed by more than 3 aftershocks ( Fig. 7), which is the number of the smaller earthquakes after the felt foreshock (ML = 5.14) on December 6, 2003. In other words, only eight events (∼14%) among 58 intermediate earthquakes were following by three or less smaller earthquakes. This result strongly indicates that the limited “aftershocks” following the felt foreshock (ML = 5.14) on December 6, 2003 was significantly different from the feature of most other intermediate earthquakes (5.0 < ML < 5.3) that were not considered as foreshocks.