This latest interpretation of governance is still in its formative stage. Confusion arises when one tries to pinpoint what exactly is an honest and corruption-free leader? Many questions need to be clarified. Is a devout Buddhist a good governance person?Is a leader who proclaims himself to follow the King's principles of self-sufficient life-style practicing good governance? Can a military dictator who claims not to be clarified. Is a devout Buddhist a good governance person? Is a leader who proclaims himself to follow the King's principles of self-sufficient life-style practicing good governance ? Can a military dictator who claims no to practice corruption be called a good governance leader?