This research is timely given current debates about the continued role that water conservation (through
demand management initiatives such as restrictions) should have, particularly once large scale
centralised infrastructure projects (such as desalination) come on line in cities. The National Water
Commission regards temporary water restrictions as “an inequitable and inefficient way of balancing
supply and demand” (Frontier Economics 2008), giving rise to the National Water Commission’s
recently published National Review of water restrictions in Australia (Institute for Sustainable Futures
and ACIL Tasman Pty Ltd 2009). The review highlights the differences perceived by both the water
industry and the public in relation to the role of permanent (low level) restrictions to water use and
temporary (and often more severe) levels of restriction. It acknowledges the need for further
information in order to determine the best way forward in the future, specifically in relation to
engaging the community and industry in decision making and to understanding their views and values.
This paper provides more recent information on Australian attitudes to water conservation