Integral imaging (II) display which is regarded as a very promising three-dimensional (3D) display presents true 3D images with
continuous viewpoints and full parallax [1]. Moreover, the II display
has been adopted to realize glass-free dual-view 3D display [2–4].
But it is difficult to realize high resolution 3D display [5]. Thus, onedimensional integral imaging (1DII) has been proposed [6]. The 1DII
display provides 3D images with high vertical resolution by removing the vertical parallax. The 1DII display using a parallax barrier has
less space and lower cost than that using a lenticular lens array [7].
A number of studies related to the viewing angle of the 1DII
display using the parallax barrier have been reported [8–10]. For
a single slit and elemental image, the viewing angle is determined
by the aperture width of the slit, the pitch of the slit and the gap
between the slit and the elemental image [7]. The viewing angle is
proportional to the aperture width of the slit [8]. For the parallax
barrier and element image array, the viewing angle is also related
to the number of the slits and the elemental images [9]. Since the
silt isn’t ideal line, the crosstalk of the 1DII display is caused by
adjacent elemental images. Thus, the viewing angle of the 1DII display is inversely proportional to the aperture width of the slit [10].
A barrier array has been used in the multiple-viewing-zone II display [4]. The barrier array is dynamic to enhance the horizontal
Integral imaging (II) display which is regarded as a very promising three-dimensional (3D) display presents true 3D images withcontinuous viewpoints and full parallax [1]. Moreover, the II displayhas been adopted to realize glass-free dual-view 3D display [2–4].But it is difficult to realize high resolution 3D display [5]. Thus, onedimensional integral imaging (1DII) has been proposed [6]. The 1DIIdisplay provides 3D images with high vertical resolution by removing the vertical parallax. The 1DII display using a parallax barrier hasless space and lower cost than that using a lenticular lens array [7].A number of studies related to the viewing angle of the 1DIIdisplay using the parallax barrier have been reported [8–10]. Fora single slit and elemental image, the viewing angle is determinedby the aperture width of the slit, the pitch of the slit and the gapbetween the slit and the elemental image [7]. The viewing angle isproportional to the aperture width of the slit [8]. For the parallaxbarrier and element image array, the viewing angle is also relatedto the number of the slits and the elemental images [9]. Since thesilt isn’t ideal line, the crosstalk of the 1DII display is caused byadjacent elemental images. Thus, the viewing angle of the 1DII display is inversely proportional to the aperture width of the slit [10].A barrier array has been used in the multiple-viewing-zone II display [4]. The barrier array is dynamic to enhance the horizontal
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98aba/98abadb1435b0cfbe63f2dabdddc22693678da81" alt=""