HR Magazine, which is a practitioner publication, includes a small minority of academic authors (about 6%) and a vast majority of practitioner readers (i.e., more than 80% of practitioners noted they “usually” or “always” read HR Magazine; Rynes et al., 2002). In contrast, in the present study, we found that a small minority of JAP and PPsych authors are non academics and the proportion of practitioner authors has decreased consistently over the years. Rynes et al. (2002) found that less than 1% of practitioners reported that they “usually” read JAP and PPsych. Moreover, a scale designed to measure how frequently respondents read each publication included the following anchors: 1 (never), 2 (rarely), 3 (sometimes), 4 (usually), and 5 (always). JAP received a mean rating of 1.19 and PPsych received a mean rating of 1.22. In general, therefore, academics tend to write in and read academic publications, and practitioners tend to write in and read practitioner publications.