Of these, the
four species of Philippine Cyrtodactylus have
been considered to be an unremarkable
assemblage from a faunistically depauperate
‘‘fringing archipelago’’ (Brown and Alcala,
1970, 1978). Included are C. agusanensis, C.
redimiculus, C. annulatus, and C. philippinicus;
the latter two taxa are considered to be
‘‘widely distributed’’ on numerous islands
throughout the archipelago (Brown and
Alcala, 1978). Because of this arrangement,
populations of Cyrtodactylus are now routinely
referred to C. annulatus or C.
philippinicus on the basis of geography
alone.
A comprehensive review of the
Of these, thefour species of Philippine Cyrtodactylus havebeen considered to be an unremarkableassemblage from a faunistically depauperate‘‘fringing archipelago’’ (Brown and Alcala,1970, 1978). Included are C. agusanensis, C.redimiculus, C. annulatus, and C. philippinicus;the latter two taxa are considered to be‘‘widely distributed’’ on numerous islandsthroughout the archipelago (Brown andAlcala, 1978). Because of this arrangement,populations of Cyrtodactylus are now routinelyreferred to C. annulatus or C.philippinicus on the basis of geographyalone.A comprehensive review of the
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
