Well, still you included ME so what’s the big fuss? It’s not the fans who included them.. You! So who should be blamed for that? What we want to know is what is your criteria in choosing a pageant to be part of grandslam? Just because it can provide a lavish production so it should be included already? What about its advocacy? Its followers? The number of years of being consistent in its telecast and advocacy? The quality and quantity of its candidates? How about how these candidates were chosen? Yes MGI hit the nail with lavish production and the beautiful girls but did you consider how these candidates came to be? There were rumors about assigning girls to be the rep just like what happened to Ms. Cuba who was really never from Cuba really but an American or Ms. Colombia who was allegedly chosen by an officer of MGI to be Colombia’s candidate. Again these are just rumors. Oh wait! You actually believe in rumors and hearsays and not actually investigate before deciding, so i am really puzzled as to how you come to your decision. Maybe i will produce my own pageant, make it as grand as possible and assign random girls to join my pageant and ask you to make it grandslam next year.
I actually don’t care now if you will not include ME in your ranking but please spare ME from your idiotic explanation! Yes idiotic because 1) that supposed conversation was edited, spliced, and not really clear unless you really speak russian but even russians had a hard time listening to that since the audio has problems. 2) if indeed there was buying, then why did miss russia not win? And as far as i know, the russians who placed in the semis are gorgeous so it is not questionable. 3) if you say that it is biased because Ms. Phils always enter the semis or get the elemental crowns, then i say why not remove all the pageants in the ranking since all of them are placing hometown girls in their pageant! And actually, if you remove your biases, you will realize that these candidates deserve to be there because they have something that we cannot explain – the x factor as they say. Not all beautiful girls win in the end. You should know that since you are a pageant fans website. 4) ME is not owned by the richest people nor is it run by a rich country so how can you expect it to have a lavish and grand production? Again, it’s not ME’s fault that you included them in the grabdslam ranking despite having low budgeted productions. You put them there despite this then you will remove them because of this also? I cannot understand your logic! 5) look at the candidates, most if not all are crowned winners or runners up! There may still be appointed but that’s so minimal. Heck even the great Osmel included ME in his pageant, so did Femina, and other reputable national directors. And the number of candidates are rising, so is the quality of the girls. Sure there are some odd ones but so do MU and MW but remember beauty is subjective. Again where are the national directors which you said will withdraw their support for ME so it became your reason to remove it? WHERE???
Now let’s go to MGi, they are new so they have lots of money still so they can afford to mount such a grand pageant. But the question is, can they maintain it. You said so yourself that despite not having a lavish production you included ME in your grandslam ranking so i assume it is not really your sole criteria, so now, why did it become a major criteria for MGI? Now if in a year or so the production of MGI, just like what happened to the 50th year of MU, flopped, will you remove it right away? Pity MGI and it fans if you will do it. Now if the candidates dwindled to half just like MTQi, will you remove it as well? Now if they will face a scandal just like ME and you did nit investigate it thoroughly, will you remove it? I think not. As long as MGI will pay you to cover the pageant, you will maintain it in the grandslam status, am i right? I hope not coz i still respect you.
Now, be fair to ME please!
Well, still you included ME so what’s the big fuss? It’s not the fans who included them.. You! So who should be blamed for that? What we want to know is what is your criteria in choosing a pageant to be part of grandslam? Just because it can provide a lavish production so it should be included already? What about its advocacy? Its followers? The number of years of being consistent in its telecast and advocacy? The quality and quantity of its candidates? How about how these candidates were chosen? Yes MGI hit the nail with lavish production and the beautiful girls but did you consider how these candidates came to be? There were rumors about assigning girls to be the rep just like what happened to Ms. Cuba who was really never from Cuba really but an American or Ms. Colombia who was allegedly chosen by an officer of MGI to be Colombia’s candidate. Again these are just rumors. Oh wait! You actually believe in rumors and hearsays and not actually investigate before deciding, so i am really puzzled as to how you come to your decision. Maybe i will produce my own pageant, make it as grand as possible and assign random girls to join my pageant and ask you to make it grandslam next year.
I actually don’t care now if you will not include ME in your ranking but please spare ME from your idiotic explanation! Yes idiotic because 1) that supposed conversation was edited, spliced, and not really clear unless you really speak russian but even russians had a hard time listening to that since the audio has problems. 2) if indeed there was buying, then why did miss russia not win? And as far as i know, the russians who placed in the semis are gorgeous so it is not questionable. 3) if you say that it is biased because Ms. Phils always enter the semis or get the elemental crowns, then i say why not remove all the pageants in the ranking since all of them are placing hometown girls in their pageant! And actually, if you remove your biases, you will realize that these candidates deserve to be there because they have something that we cannot explain – the x factor as they say. Not all beautiful girls win in the end. You should know that since you are a pageant fans website. 4) ME is not owned by the richest people nor is it run by a rich country so how can you expect it to have a lavish and grand production? Again, it’s not ME’s fault that you included them in the grabdslam ranking despite having low budgeted productions. You put them there despite this then you will remove them because of this also? I cannot understand your logic! 5) look at the candidates, most if not all are crowned winners or runners up! There may still be appointed but that’s so minimal. Heck even the great Osmel included ME in his pageant, so did Femina, and other reputable national directors. And the number of candidates are rising, so is the quality of the girls. Sure there are some odd ones but so do MU and MW but remember beauty is subjective. Again where are the national directors which you said will withdraw their support for ME so it became your reason to remove it? WHERE???
Now let’s go to MGi, they are new so they have lots of money still so they can afford to mount such a grand pageant. But the question is, can they maintain it. You said so yourself that despite not having a lavish production you included ME in your grandslam ranking so i assume it is not really your sole criteria, so now, why did it become a major criteria for MGI? Now if in a year or so the production of MGI, just like what happened to the 50th year of MU, flopped, will you remove it right away? Pity MGI and it fans if you will do it. Now if the candidates dwindled to half just like MTQi, will you remove it as well? Now if they will face a scandal just like ME and you did nit investigate it thoroughly, will you remove it? I think not. As long as MGI will pay you to cover the pageant, you will maintain it in the grandslam status, am i right? I hope not coz i still respect you.
Now, be fair to ME please!
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
