The aim of the paper was to administer and prepare teachers for management to their students’
learning achievements within the curriculum framework of water resource and disaster management.
This course was compared to manage learning into different school sizes with the sample size in the
lower secondary education schools with two groups of 28 controlled teachers, who managed teaching
of 68 students in 3 classes, and other group was 28 experimental teachers who managed teaching of 79
students in 3 other classes at grade level 9 too. The procedure of methodology included curriculum
framework; unstructured selection interviews and conservational guidebooks were used. Most of
teachers were trained with a new curriculum of learning units and training local curriculum.
Associations between teachers’ satisfaction of pre- and post- test questionnaires were differenced,
developing the curriculum was indicated that it has revealed problems and students’ needs indicted as
high responses on introduction, and purpose of recapitulating development. Teachers were passed the
assessment test as high quality ability impacts and satisfactions for making learning units to students’
responsibilities. Statistically significance of students’ achievements were differences between the
controlling and experimental groups at .01 confidence level, correlatively, and comparisons between
using this local curriculum frame work in school sizes as non significant differently.
The aim of the paper was to administer and prepare teachers for management to their students’learning achievements within the curriculum framework of water resource and disaster management.This course was compared to manage learning into different school sizes with the sample size in thelower secondary education schools with two groups of 28 controlled teachers, who managed teachingof 68 students in 3 classes, and other group was 28 experimental teachers who managed teaching of 79students in 3 other classes at grade level 9 too. The procedure of methodology included curriculumframework; unstructured selection interviews and conservational guidebooks were used. Most ofteachers were trained with a new curriculum of learning units and training local curriculum.Associations between teachers’ satisfaction of pre- and post- test questionnaires were differenced,developing the curriculum was indicated that it has revealed problems and students’ needs indicted ashigh responses on introduction, and purpose of recapitulating development. Teachers were passed theassessment test as high quality ability impacts and satisfactions for making learning units to students’responsibilities. Statistically significance of students’ achievements were differences between thecontrolling and experimental groups at .01 confidence level, correlatively, and comparisons betweenusing this local curriculum frame work in school sizes as non significant differently.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
