Summary This article is an attempt to contribute to a theoretical foundation for art in
management education. I do so by building on Ernst Cassirer’s relational, processual, and
non-dualistic theory. I start by introducing Cassirer’s main ideas and I try to relate them to
management knowledge with a special emphasis on art and science as complementary forms of
knowing. Thereafter I sketch some of the challenges we may face if aiming at developing twoeyed
management education, that is, education based on a binocular vision that combines the
‘‘eye of science’’ with the ‘‘eye of art’’. I argue in line with Cassirer that art is a way of knowing,
and I claim that art has an important role to play if we wish to develop proficient, two-eyed
managers.1
# 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Summary This article is an attempt to contribute to a theoretical foundation for art inmanagement education. I do so by building on Ernst Cassirer’s relational, processual, andnon-dualistic theory. I start by introducing Cassirer’s main ideas and I try to relate them tomanagement knowledge with a special emphasis on art and science as complementary forms ofknowing. Thereafter I sketch some of the challenges we may face if aiming at developing twoeyedmanagement education, that is, education based on a binocular vision that combines the‘‘eye of science’’ with the ‘‘eye of art’’. I argue in line with Cassirer that art is a way of knowing,and I claim that art has an important role to play if we wish to develop proficient, two-eyedmanagers.1# 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
