The MPF evolution (Figure 2, Table 4) shows a sustaining
fatigue for the Trapezius muscles left and right (mainly RS) < 0.01), a moderate fatigue in SS and a low in CS and
correspond with the MVC Trapezius muscles losses. There
is an opposite fatigue in the Flexor muscles for SS and RS,
left negative, right positive for SS and inversed for RS. The
compensation effect could be attributed to an influence
of the individuals’ right or left hand preferences .For CS
both Flexors are improved. The extensor muscles left and
right were improved in all three types of massage
therapies.
The differences between static load in the Trapezius
muscles and dynamic contractions in the forearm muscles
correspond with the higher VAS scores, which can be
explained by the type of muscle contraction.
In the forearm muscles, the dynamic muscle work
(contraction/de-contraction) performed over 30 s, foster
the lactate removal and fatigue will not create serious
problems, and the e unconscious e switch in efforts between
left-right arms has a balancing effect on the fatigue
MPF. The positive effects can be linked to the advantageous
dynamic pattern of ‘contraction and relaxation’ which
creates micro recovery periods.
The MPF evolution (Figure 2, Table 4) shows a sustainingfatigue for the Trapezius muscles left and right (mainly RS) < 0.01), a moderate fatigue in SS and a low in CS andcorrespond with the MVC Trapezius muscles losses. Thereis an opposite fatigue in the Flexor muscles for SS and RS,left negative, right positive for SS and inversed for RS. Thecompensation effect could be attributed to an influenceof the individuals’ right or left hand preferences .For CSboth Flexors are improved. The extensor muscles left andright were improved in all three types of massagetherapies.The differences between static load in the Trapeziusmuscles and dynamic contractions in the forearm musclescorrespond with the higher VAS scores, which can beexplained by the type of muscle contraction.In the forearm muscles, the dynamic muscle work(contraction/de-contraction) performed over 30 s, fosterthe lactate removal and fatigue will not create seriousproblems, and the e unconscious e switch in efforts betweenleft-right arms has a balancing effect on the fatigueMPF. The positive effects can be linked to the advantageousdynamic pattern of ‘contraction and relaxation’ whichcreates micro recovery periods.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..

The MPF evolution (Figure 2, Table 4) shows a sustaining
fatigue for the Trapezius muscles left and right (mainly RS) < 0.01), a moderate fatigue in SS and a low in CS and
correspond with the MVC Trapezius muscles losses. There
is an opposite fatigue in the Flexor muscles for SS and RS,
left negative, right positive for SS and inversed for RS. The
compensation effect could be attributed to an influence
of the individuals’ right or left hand preferences .For CS
both Flexors are improved. The extensor muscles left and
right were improved in all three types of massage
therapies.
The differences between static load in the Trapezius
muscles and dynamic contractions in the forearm muscles
correspond with the higher VAS scores, which can be
explained by the type of muscle contraction.
In the forearm muscles, the dynamic muscle work
(contraction/de-contraction) performed over 30 s, foster
the lactate removal and fatigue will not create serious
problems, and the e unconscious e switch in efforts between
left-right arms has a balancing effect on the fatigue
MPF. The positive effects can be linked to the advantageous
dynamic pattern of ‘contraction and relaxation’ which
creates micro recovery periods.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
