The commercially available activated carbon is much expensive, and moreover, regeneration using solution produces small additional effluent, while regeneration by refractory technique results in a 10-15% loss of adsorbents and its uptake capacity
The commercially available activated carbon is muchexpensive, and moreover, regeneration using solution producessmall additional effluent, while regeneration by refractorytechnique results in a 10-15% loss of adsorbentsand its uptake capacity