One useful way of mapping the connections between experience and habit onto the process of translation is through the work of Charles Sanders Peirce ( 1857-1913), the American philosopher and founder of semiotics.
Peirce addressed the connections between experience and habit in the framework of a triad, or tree-step process, moving from instinct through experience to habit.
Peirce understood everything i terms of these triadic or three-step movements: instinct, in this triad, is a First, or a general unfocused readiness; experience is a Second, grounded in real world activities and events that work on the individual from the outside; and habit is a Third, transcending the opposition between general readiness and external experience by incorporating both into a "promptitude of action " ( 1931-66: 5.477), " a person's tendencies toward action "( 5.476 ), a " readiness to act " ( 5.480 )- to act, specifically, in a certain way under certain circumstances as shaped by experience ( see Figure 2).
One may be instinctively ready to act, but that instinctive readiness is not yet directed by experience of the world, and so remains vague and undirected; experience of the world is powerfully there, it hits one full in the face, it must be dealt with, but because of its multiplicity it too remains formless and undirected.
It is only when an inclination to act is enriched and complicated by experience, and experience is directed and organized by an istinctive inclination to act, that both are sublimated together as habit, a readiness to do specific things under specific conditions-translate certain kinds of texts i certain ways, for example.
One useful way of mapping the connections between experience and habit onto the process of translation is through the work of Charles Sanders Peirce ( 1857-1913), the American philosopher and founder of semiotics.Peirce addressed the connections between experience and habit in the framework of a triad, or tree-step process, moving from instinct through experience to habit.Peirce understood everything i terms of these triadic or three-step movements: instinct, in this triad, is a First, or a general unfocused readiness; experience is a Second, grounded in real world activities and events that work on the individual from the outside; and habit is a Third, transcending the opposition between general readiness and external experience by incorporating both into a "promptitude of action " ( 1931-66: 5.477), " a person's tendencies toward action "( 5.476 ), a " readiness to act " ( 5.480 )- to act, specifically, in a certain way under certain circumstances as shaped by experience ( see Figure 2).One may be instinctively ready to act, but that instinctive readiness is not yet directed by experience of the world, and so remains vague and undirected; experience of the world is powerfully there, it hits one full in the face, it must be dealt with, but because of its multiplicity it too remains formless and undirected.It is only when an inclination to act is enriched and complicated by experience, and experience is directed and organized by an istinctive inclination to act, that both are sublimated together as habit, a readiness to do specific things under specific conditions-translate certain kinds of texts i certain ways, for example.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
