gs fed the 6% FSBM diet had greater (P < 0.05)
ADFI when compared to the control during wk 2 and wk 3. As a result, feed efficiency
was superior (P < 0.05) in the 6% FSBM diet over the control during wk 1, wk 2, wk 3,
and the duration of the trial. In the same study, a second experiment assessed the growth
performance of pigs fed FSBM at 3%, 6%, and 9% of the diet. Both the ADFI and ADG of pigs consuming the 9% FSBM diet were greater than the control during wk 1 and wk 2
of the trial.