Team leaders tended to feel most empowered when they had more prior training and NEPA experience, there was clear communication with the decision maker, and the decision maker
prioritized the process. Team leader empowerment was also associated with higher degrees of collaborative deliberation on the ID team, lower levels of team disagreement, greater achievement of best science, and greater commitment to public involvement. More positive opinions of the science employed in processes were also associated with more collaborative deliberation on the ID team and an empowering leadership style of the team leader. Teamdisagreement was associated with higher degrees of upward and inward accountabilities and a lack of clear communication by the decision maker. In general, outward accountability was positively associated with positive predictors of outcomes, while upward accountability was typically negatively associated. The implications of these relationships are discussed below.
Team leaders tended to feel most empowered when they had more prior training and NEPA experience, there was clear communication with the decision maker, and the decision maker
prioritized the process. Team leader empowerment was also associated with higher degrees of collaborative deliberation on the ID team, lower levels of team disagreement, greater achievement of best science, and greater commitment to public involvement. More positive opinions of the science employed in processes were also associated with more collaborative deliberation on the ID team and an empowering leadership style of the team leader. Teamdisagreement was associated with higher degrees of upward and inward accountabilities and a lack of clear communication by the decision maker. In general, outward accountability was positively associated with positive predictors of outcomes, while upward accountability was typically negatively associated. The implications of these relationships are discussed below.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..