By the end of the 1980s, just over 60% of German 16–19 year olds took
apprenticeship-level qualifications compared with 27% in Britain18 (Prais
1995: 22). Prais makes a further division between a ‘higher’, technician level,
involving more full-time training, and a ‘lower’, craftsman level, trained in
large part at the workplace, because the difference between Britain and
Germany lies entirely at the craftsman or workplace-based qualification level.
Both countries have 7% of the workforce trained to technician level, but 57%
of the German workforce is trained to craftsman level compared with 20%
of the British19 (Prais 1995: 18). As far as technicians are produced by and
work within the large-company sector, the difference between the countries
emphasises that technical training is a particular problem for small and
medium-sized firms, where the free-rider effect is most likely to operate. These
differences in raw numbers beg the question of how the institution is organised
in Germany.
By the end of the 1980s, just over 60% of German 16–19 year olds took
apprenticeship-level qualifications compared with 27% in Britain18 (Prais
1995: 22). Prais makes a further division between a ‘higher’, technician level,
involving more full-time training, and a ‘lower’, craftsman level, trained in
large part at the workplace, because the difference between Britain and
Germany lies entirely at the craftsman or workplace-based qualification level.
Both countries have 7% of the workforce trained to technician level, but 57%
of the German workforce is trained to craftsman level compared with 20%
of the British19 (Prais 1995: 18). As far as technicians are produced by and
work within the large-company sector, the difference between the countries
emphasises that technical training is a particular problem for small and
medium-sized firms, where the free-rider effect is most likely to operate. These
differences in raw numbers beg the question of how the institution is organised
in Germany.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..