shows that when the awning is extended and
the cows’ heads are shaded, the left eyes and the right eyes have
approximately the same IRT temperature (38.29 C vs. 38.15 C),
whereas when the awning is retracted and the cows’ heads are exposed
to direct sunlight, the left eyes show higher elevated IRT
temperature than the right eyes (38.85 vs. 38.26 C), and both eyes
show elevated temperatures compared to the shade condition provided
by the awning. Using the t-test paired sample for means, the
null hypothesis (temperature difference is 0) can be rejected in the
case of the left eye data, but not for the right eye data. For the left
eye in direct sunlight, the 95% confidence interval is an increase in
IRT temperature of 0.56 ± 0.36 C. While the right eye data shows
slightly elevated temperatures in the awning open (sun) versus
the awning down (shade) condition, most likely due to the perforated
nature of the awning, the result is not statistically significant,
as it is not in direct sunlight.
shows that when the awning is extended and
the cows’ heads are shaded, the left eyes and the right eyes have
approximately the same IRT temperature (38.29 C vs. 38.15 C),
whereas when the awning is retracted and the cows’ heads are exposed
to direct sunlight, the left eyes show higher elevated IRT
temperature than the right eyes (38.85 vs. 38.26 C), and both eyes
show elevated temperatures compared to the shade condition provided
by the awning. Using the t-test paired sample for means, the
null hypothesis (temperature difference is 0) can be rejected in the
case of the left eye data, but not for the right eye data. For the left
eye in direct sunlight, the 95% confidence interval is an increase in
IRT temperature of 0.56 ± 0.36 C. While the right eye data shows
slightly elevated temperatures in the awning open (sun) versus
the awning down (shade) condition, most likely due to the perforated
nature of the awning, the result is not statistically significant,
as it is not in direct sunlight.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
