The RME1 × SSRY28 combinations presented the
lowest genotypic coincidence (0.68), while the NS169 ×
SSRY28, NS169 × RME1, and NS158 × RME1 combinations
showed intermediate coincidences (ranging from
0.70 to 0.72) (Table 3). In addition, the greatest genetic
distance between the NS169 × RME1 markers (20 cM -
Figure 1) tended to result in less genotypic coincidence
between these two accessions due to the possibility of
historical occurrence of crossing over between these
markers, but the results showed a median genotypic coincidence
(Table 3).