Abstract
We analyze the loss-reserving practices of 562 insurance companies in 1993 to assess the relation
between client influence and auditor oversight. Consistent with Petroni [1992. Management’s
response to the differential costs and benefits of optimistic reporting in the property-casualty
insurance industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics 15, 485–508.], we find that financially
struggling insurers tend to under-reserve. However, this behavior is attenuated when the weak insurer
is important to the local practice office of the auditor. This result holds across various measures of
client influence and supports the contention of Reynolds and Francis [2001. Does size matter? The
influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting divisions. Journal of Accounting and
Economics 30, 375–400.] that auditors allow less accounting discretion to their larger clients.