The finer spatial resolution of the GLW 2 maps (approximate
cell size of 1 km2 at the equator) also significantly increases the
detail of predictions compared to the original version (approximate
cell size of 5 km2 at the equator). Figure 4 helps to illustrate this
with an example from central Uganda. In this case, the finer pixel
size combines with a higher disaggregation of the training data;
input data were at administrative levels 1 and 4 respectively in the
GLW 2007 and GLW 2.