In the right circumstances, you certainly wouldn't
mind calling with a hand like nine-seven suited. Ideally,
you'd like to be in position against a loose-passive player
with a big stack. The big stack would give you the implied
odds needed with a suited one-gap hand, and a loose-passive
style means that he'll likely call at least a bet or two when
you hit your hand and give you the choice between semibluffing
or just taking a free card when you need it. (Against
most loose-passive players you'll be taking the free card
since semi-bluffing won't work as often as you'd like.)
Here, however, you're against a loose but very
aggressive player with a short stack. The loose part is nice
because you're almost getting the pot odds you need to call
right away. (Your hand is 38 percent against a 40 percent
raising range which is probably about right for this player in
the cutoff.) But his short stack and his 100 percent
continuation betting frequency means that this hand will tend
to be decided early, rather than late. When there's a good
chance that the hand will be settled on the flop, you'd rather
be playing a high-card hand which has a better chance of
making top pair than a medium-card hand that tends to make
second pair or a draw.
So calling here with nine-seven suited certainly wouldn't
qualify as a blunder, but 1'd wait for a better position against
a bigger stack. If Player E, instead of Player D, was the one
raising in the cutoff, you'd have an easy call.