The taxonomic status of Cherax destructor is under debate identified four species in the ‘C. destructor’ species-group: C. albidus, C. destructor, C. esculus, and C. davisi. Today there is consensus that C. esculus and C. davisi do not deserve recognition at the species level and that C. albidus and C. destructor are separate taxa. However, there is some disagreement concerning at what level the latter two taxa should be recognized and even if they should be distinguished at all. Using morphological and morphometric data, considered C. albidus as a distinct species. On the contrary, basing their view on genetic evidence, and Austin interpreted the taxon as a subspecies of C. destructor. Austin even stated that C. albidus and C. destructor are synonyms. The majority of zoologists use the species epithet destructor, but, for essentially commercial reasons, Western Australian Fisheries personnel use the epithet albidus
“Austin also recommended that C. setosus - formally referred to as C. destructor rotundus- should be recognized at the species level and that C. rotundus is a distinct species. The analysis of samples within the larger systematic context of eastern Australia
The taxonomic status of Cherax destructor is under debate identified four species in the ‘C. destructor’ species-group: C. albidus, C. destructor, C. esculus, and C. davisi. Today there is consensus that C. esculus and C. davisi do not deserve recognition at the species level and that C. albidus and C. destructor are separate taxa. However, there is some disagreement concerning at what level the latter two taxa should be recognized and even if they should be distinguished at all. Using morphological and morphometric data, considered C. albidus as a distinct species. On the contrary, basing their view on genetic evidence, and Austin interpreted the taxon as a subspecies of C. destructor. Austin even stated that C. albidus and C. destructor are synonyms. The majority of zoologists use the species epithet destructor, but, for essentially commercial reasons, Western Australian Fisheries personnel use the epithet albidus
“Austin also recommended that C. setosus - formally referred to as C. destructor rotundus- should be recognized at the species level and that C. rotundus is a distinct species. The analysis of samples within the larger systematic context of eastern Australia
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
