results. Furthermore, almost all existing studies on socialties, social
capital, and homogeneity and group repayment focus on intragroup
socialties. Exemptions here are for instanceWoolcock (1999)
and Montgomery (1996). Woolcock (1999) states that group-based
programs in Bangladesh do not facilitate transitions into nonfarm
employment, while group-based programs in Indonesia that
seek explicitly to encourage nonlocal exchange, do facilitate this
transition. Montgomery (1996) points outthatthe individual group
members ofthe Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee (BRAC)
who faced repayment problems turned for help to relatives or close
friends outside the group rather than to other members. Because
of the ambiguous empirical results, it is rather difficult to draw any
general conclusion.
results. Furthermore, almost all existing studies on socialties, socialcapital, and homogeneity and group repayment focus on intragroupsocialties. Exemptions here are for instanceWoolcock (1999)and Montgomery (1996). Woolcock (1999) states that group-basedprograms in Bangladesh do not facilitate transitions into nonfarmemployment, while group-based programs in Indonesia thatseek explicitly to encourage nonlocal exchange, do facilitate thistransition. Montgomery (1996) points outthatthe individual groupmembers ofthe Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee (BRAC)who faced repayment problems turned for help to relatives or closefriends outside the group rather than to other members. Becauseof the ambiguous empirical results, it is rather difficult to draw anygeneral conclusion.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
