Regarding the feedback below of your email below back in last July to the above subject, we have been using our head office company bank in Hong Kong to make the payment directly to our local employees for wages/salaries and the local landlord for office rent for the time being since the account was closed by Bangkok Citibank in Aug-end.
Can you please help to provide further clarification regarding the risks being faced by the rep. oofice if we continue the current way we operate the office’s payments by using the head office account in Hong Kong , especially on the following points with the first two you indicated, and others?
1. Renewal for the work permit for our legal manager, Amuary Papillault (holding French nationality) for our rep. office may need to ask for documents like bank statement by Immigration Department – any other important document can be presented as replacement for bnak statement? What would be the extent with your experience that may be possibly affecting the work permit renewal application for our colleague?
2. What did you mean by transferring money to Thailand would be arousing MOC’s interest and examination………..our duty of clarification for its being not the rep. office’s income? As far as our rep. office’s books and ledgers and transactions concerned, our local accountant who has been handling with our annual audit, audited reports issuance, and tax filing etc for some years knows all expenses/payment incurred only related to the operation of the office. We do have sometimes money transferred directly made by our Hong Kong head office as payment to some local services provider/contractor for helping with the repairing/maintenance work performed on our products sold to a few local customers. Were you referring to that kinds? Please clarify more.
3. Other risks/points may be affecting our rep. office’s operation, perhaps?