Our results did support our fourth hypothesis, which stated that in-class activities would
increase scores on both comprehension and application level test items. However, it
should be noted that while comprehension and application level test items were significantly
higher than knowledge level items, the average score on knowledge level items
was 79%. Arguably, this lends more evidence to the claims that in-class activities (ICA)
are the most effective of all the techniques because they allow students to actually manipulate
and practice applying the information for their selves (Forsyth, 2003; Whetten &
Clark, 1996).