Based on the discussion with K. Sornapath and K. Narumol about OEM P/O and below are possible options arranging based on the most preferable option:
• HQ creates P/O via HQ’s AX system and develop F/Gs movement report via QlickView system
• HQ creates new AX user (to access to HQ’s AX system) whom assist HQ to create P/O and monitor F/Gs delivered by OEM. If PPT handles F/Gs movement on behalf of HQ.
• PPT creates P/O in PPT’s AX system but need assistance from IT to customize P/O heading (to be Pandora A/S) and apply stock card function in order to monitor F/Gs movement.
Please be informed that the above propose is based on the structure in attached email (namely ‘OEM interim structure May-Dec 14’). I expect that this issue will be included as a part of this Friday meeting.