Section 362
[Reopening to the Defendant’s Detriment]
Reopening of proceedings concluded by a final judgment shall be admissible to the defendant’s detriment
1. if a document produced as genuine, for his benefit, at the main hearing was false or forged;
2. if a witness or expert, when giving testimony or an opinion for the defendant’s benefit, was guilty of wilful or negligent violation of the duty imposed by the oath, or of wilfully making a false, unsworn statement;
3. if a judge or lay judge participated in drafting the judgment who was guilty of a criminal violation of his official duties in relation to the case;
4. if the person acquitted makes a credible confession, in or outside the court, that he committed the criminal offence.