questionnaire which not only coped with physical attributes and teaching methodology but also taken into account the socio-cultural facets. That kind of checklist which could satisfy such purpose was Litz's (2001) well designed questionnaire. Therefore, we have the study equipped with questionnaire adopted from Litz (2001). This questionnaire entails four parts: student textbook evaluation form, teacher textbook evaluation, student profile, and student needs analysis. The first two parts were primary in evaluating the textbook while the other forms were used as supplementary ones. They did not directly contribute to the evaluation of the textbook. Thus, this study included only two parts of this frame work, student textbook evaluation form and teacher textbook evaluation form.