UAT results are noted. Since it occurs in selection "Expense " this time it looks like the program logic for three different selection type is independent with each other since PART was amended already but EXPENSE got the same issue.. We will look for the Asset selection too before endorsing back to you.
Please note that we are also checking a scenario where original GR was reversed (see below). If you look at the report PO number 4500016732 is included in "GR not yet IR" repor which is incorrect also. It looks like the current program fails to consider also the reversal document (102) of the original GR