Special attention has also been paid to the effect of curing and temperature evolution on prestressed concrete bridge girders. Roller et al.6 investigated the effects of curing temperature on high-strength concrete in five AASHTO Type III bridge girders with bonded pretensioned strands. Their findings highlighted an 11% reduction in the average prestressing force due to thermal expansion of the steel during cement hydration. Barr et al.7 monitored a precast, prestressed concrete bridge girder during fabrication and the first three years of service. They found that high curing temperatures during fabrication can reduce the calculated prestress by up to 7%, reduce the initial camber by upto 40%, and increase the in-service bottom tensile stress by up to 27%. The structural behavior of high-strength concrete bridge girders was also monitored by Roller et al.,8 who compared the measured and calculated prestress losses. They found that the measured prestress losses derived from concrete strains, corrected for the temperature and load effects, were lower than the corresponding values calculated using the AASHTO LRFD specifications.9 Prestress losses, camber growth, and other parameters were monitored by Dwairi et al.10 in several prestressed high-performance concrete bridge girders. Among other interesting data, a temperature increase ∆T of almost 72°F (40°C) was recorded by the researchers during cement hydration. Barr and Angomas11 highlighted the effect on camber of the temperature gradient during the curing of prestressed concrete girders and presented a procedure to calculate it.