METHODOLOGY AND PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION (June 2000-2001)
In its first manifestation (June 2000-2001), the project’s emphasis was divided
into two parts namely market and supervisory reform. This dichotomy required analysts
to research leading financial markets and comparable peer, in order to distinguish
international financial trends and identify potential roles of deposit-taking financial
institutions, scope of business for each type of financial institution, possible structure for
conglomerates and universal banks, and the matching supervisory regime and interagency
coordination.
Together with the above activities, preliminary domestic stocktaking was
undertaken to ascertain shortcomings within each segment of Thailand’s financial
system. This included third party examination of the future direction of finance
companies and credit fonciers, surveys of service providers and corporate users, and a
system wide SWOT2 analysis.
METHODOLOGY AND PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION (June 2000-2001)In its first manifestation (June 2000-2001), the project’s emphasis was dividedinto two parts namely market and supervisory reform. This dichotomy required analyststo research leading financial markets and comparable peer, in order to distinguishinternational financial trends and identify potential roles of deposit-taking financialinstitutions, scope of business for each type of financial institution, possible structure forconglomerates and universal banks, and the matching supervisory regime and interagencycoordination.Together with the above activities, preliminary domestic stocktaking wasundertaken to ascertain shortcomings within each segment of Thailand’s financialsystem. This included third party examination of the future direction of financecompanies and credit fonciers, surveys of service providers and corporate users, and asystem wide SWOT2 analysis.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..